Federalizing VOTING STANDARDS is not the same as “federalizing elections,” and implementing such standards is crucial and should not be feared
by Edward Ulrich, updated September 15, 2022
Image from Flickr.
[Note: September 15, 2022— The text of this article has been updated.]
Recently I saw a Breitbart article entitled “Iowa Is Why We Must Never Federalize Our Elections,” which essentially claims that federalization of elections would result in enabling the global elite to implement their fraudulent voting machines and practices in every precinct in every U.S. state, however the article does not consider the option of adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution (which is a “federal” approach) that would outlaw the use of all types of electronic voting counting (including the electronic counting of paper ballots), and ensure that only one foolproof standard for manually casting and counting votes is used everywhere.
I agree with some of the points that the article makes, however I think in some ways it has too much as a “purist” anti-federalization attitude when it comes to the issue of election fraud.
The U.S. Constitution is primarily a tool whose purpose is to stop the potentially corrupt actions of the government by limiting governmental powers, so it would make sense to implement a Constitutional amendment that outlaws fraudulent voting practices— especially an amendment that outlaws the use of electronic vote counting due to the fact that such technology can never be trusted.
With Diebold voting machines, every vote is stored on a memory card along with additional computer code. This video clip from the HBO special “Hacking Democracy” shows how an election can be altered through a person only having access to a memory card. The video shows how the hack works even with Diebold machines that only tabulate paper ballots, and how it is impossible to detect the fraud once it has happened.
NOTE: November 20, 2020— The fraudulent machines demonstrated in this video are essentially the same type that were used by many states in the 2020 Presidential Election! The Diebold company was acquired by Dominion in 2010, and Dominion’s machines are still very easily able to be hacked into. For examples of that, see this article that contains a 2018 New York Times video that demonstrates a Dominon machine being hacked, and see this 2018 Symantec video showing the large amount of venerabilities that are still in the most recent types of voting machines.
NOTE: November 20, 2020— The fraudulent machines demonstrated in this video are essentially the same type that were used by many states in the 2020 Presidential Election! The Diebold company was acquired by Dominion in 2010, and Dominion’s machines are still very easily able to be hacked into. For examples of that, see this article that contains a 2018 New York Times video that demonstrates a Dominon machine being hacked, and see this 2018 Symantec video showing the large amount of venerabilities that are still in the most recent types of voting machines.
The artice makes the following statements:
Things work best when every precinct is its own fiefdom. This ensures mistakes are confined to one small precinct, or that fraud is confined to one small precinct — anything that goes amiss is compartmentalized by default.
...
With a smaller operation, there’s also more accountability.
It’s much, much, much easier to demand accountability from local government than the bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy the federal government has become, and the prospect of personal accountability keeps those responsible on their toes and determined to do things right.
There are around 120,000 separate precincts in this country. Even Mr. Federalize himself, Barack Obama, admitted in 2016 that you can’t rig an American election “in part, because they’re so decentralized.”
...
...
With a smaller operation, there’s also more accountability.
It’s much, much, much easier to demand accountability from local government than the bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy the federal government has become, and the prospect of personal accountability keeps those responsible on their toes and determined to do things right.
There are around 120,000 separate precincts in this country. Even Mr. Federalize himself, Barack Obama, admitted in 2016 that you can’t rig an American election “in part, because they’re so decentralized.”
...
I mostly disagree with the claim however, since fraudulent voting machines are continuing to be used by local municipalities all over the country, even after issues with such devices have been exposed in the mainstream media. Also I think the people in charge of the local municipalities are in fact usually put in place by the corrupt political Establishment.
Article Tree
| A Summary of Election Fraud Issues in the United States |
 |
Federalizing VOTING STANDARDS is not the same as “federalizing elections,” and implementing such standards is crucial and should not be feared |
Audio: Alex Jones Speaks With Len Horowitz About Issues of the 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak
recorded April 29, 2009
running time 45 minutes
