Federalizing VOTING STANDARDS is not the same as “federalizing elections,” and implementing such standards is crucial and should not be feared

 by Edward Ulrich, updated September 15, 2022


[Note: September 15, 2022— The text of this article has been updated.]

Recently I saw a Breitbart article entitled “Iowa Is Why We Must Never Federalize Our Elections,” which essentially claims that federalization of elections would result in enabling the global elite to implement their fraudulent voting machines and practices in every precinct in every U.S. state, however the article does not consider the option of adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution (which is a “federal” approach) that would outlaw the use of all types of electronic voting counting (including the electronic counting of paper ballots), and ensure that only one foolproof standard for manually casting and counting votes is used everywhere.

I agree with some of the points that the article makes, however I think in some ways it has too much as a “purist” anti-federalization attitude when it comes to the issue of election fraud.

The U.S. Constitution is primarily a tool whose purpose is to stop the potentially corrupt actions of the government by limiting governmental powers, so it would make sense to implement a Constitutional amendment that outlaws fraudulent voting practices— especially an amendment that outlaws the use of electronic vote counting due to the fact that such technology can never be trusted.







The artice makes the following statements:




I mostly disagree with the claim however, since fraudulent voting machines are continuing to be used by local municipalities all over the country, even after issues with such devices have been exposed in the mainstream media.  Also I think the people in charge of the local municipalities are in fact usually put in place by the corrupt political Establishment.