Motives of the Globalist Establishment


This compilation of video clips from the documentary video “Global Warming or Global Governance?” explains why many scientists, journalists, and politicians of the political Establishment have an agenda of perpetuating the idea of current global warming being extreme and caused by man’s activities, despite much surprising evidence to the contrary— largely due to common ulterior motives of offering solutions which actually impose deceptive and dangerous globalist agendas.

Currently over $4 billion is being spent annually on global warming research, and the issue has turned into a cottage industry with a large cadre of scientists on “soft money”— meaning they would cease to recieve funding if they do not somehow show a global warming connection to carbon dioxide emissions through their research.

Scientists who deny man caused warming are frequently accused of taking money from the energy industry, but very often the opposite is true.  Many energy companies exert heavy political pressure for allocating increasingly large amounts of money to the global warming issue and for passing economically damaging legislation, and often such companies individually receive billions of dollars from that legislation.

Global warming issues are being used by powerful political organizations to help form a centralized world government, by setting precedents for international control and regulation that are shown to actually have little or nothing to do with global warming.  The video clip shows many examples of political elites having deceptive agendas of dissolving the sovereignty of nations including the United States, through setting up treaties that erode personal freedoms, national security, and land ownership, among many other rights.

The media and political groups such as the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) commonly distorts issues concerning global warming by continually stating that it is a “settled science” and there is no longer any reason to debate, even though it is shown that a large proportion of climate scientists are doubtful of man’s role in global warming and they do not believe that the science is sound enough for formulating policy decisions.

Most people in the government and media get the wrong impression from reading the “Summaries for Policy Makers” put out by the IPCC.  Dr. Vincent Gray, an Expert IPCC Reviewer and Climate Consultant in New Zealand says, “This ‘Summary for Policy Makers’ isn’t a summary for policy makers at all, it is a summary ‘by’ policy makers— in other words, it is a summary that is agreed line by line, by government representatives.  The IPCC is a political organization, set up by the United Nations, to provide evidence to support the framework convention on climate change which has been signed by governments, it is entirely political.”

Also shown is a CNN broadcast by Chris Horner explaining how the IPCC reports are controlled by bureaucrats, policy makers, and pressure group lobbyists who modify the findings of contributing scientists to conform to pre-specified summaries that are established months before the underlying work is actually even written.

Phyllis Schlafly explains the issue of the United Nations global conferences, “These global conferences pretend to be democratic conventions of representatives of more than 100 nations who come together to vote for plans they all agree on— nothing could be further from the truth.  The policies are all written ahead of time, and the so-called ‘delegates’ are manipulated to produce what is called ‘consensus.’  The consensus is never submitted to Congress.” For example, Kathy Adams of the Texas Eagle Forum explains that the consensus process at a recent United Nations meeting about global warming was so firmly planted that at the opening day of the conference that there was consensus already formed, without suitable opportunity for debate.  Essentially the agenda had been set beforehand and delegates come to the table to find what their working orders are.  [Note: October 13, 2022— Years ago I had very naively criticized Phyllis Schlafly, as it was before I was fully aware of the agendas of the New Word Order.  She was outspoken about conservative stances, such as being opposed to the benevolent-sounding leftist “Equal Rights Amendment” which she successfully blocked from being ratified into the U.S. Constitution in 1978.  Thankfully it never became a part of the Constitution.  (And have women somehow suffered because of that?— Certainly not.)]

Coffman explains why the Koyoto protocol has nothing to do with actually reducing the carbon dioxide levels in the Earth’s atmosphere.  Nations such as China and Russia would not be bound by the treaty and could continue to expand and pollute forever, and in fact China will overtake the emissions of carbon dioxide by the United States within two years.  In actually, it is a massive income redistribution plan to shift money to third world nations as well as making them subservient, and it will not help global warming whatsoever.

Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope” which was published in 1975 explains many of the long-term agendas of the Globalists, including “...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.  This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. (p 324).”  These private groups, meetings and conferences still exist today under a cloud of secrecy, such as with the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and many others.

The phrase “New World Order” raised many red flags of concern and was dropped almost as soon as President Bush mentioned it during the first Gulf War.  Soon afterwards, The Commission on Global Governance was formed in association with the United Nations, and in the report “Our Global Neighborhood” published in 1995, it laid out a list of implementation goals for global governance, and it reported that exploiting issues concerning the environment are key to that agenda.  On page 208 it states, “Considerable strides have been made in creating a system of international environmental governance to achieve global sustainable development through the management of cross-border environmental disputes and protection of the global commons.”  On page 213 it states, “A carbon tax...  would no doubt be a valuable step forward... towards a radically different system— one that taxes the resource use rather than employment (through payroll taxes) and savings.  This would recognize the need to discourage excessive consumption and would stimulate employment as part of a strategy of sustainable development.”  This strategy is used in Al Gore’s proposed plans for implementing carbon taxes.

Al Gore is interested in the use of “cap and trade schemes” which are to be implemented through a system he helped to create while being Vice President which involves “public-private partnerships”— which shift decision making from the electorate and elected officials to a non-accountable partnership of non-governmental organizations, government bureaucracies, and multinational corporations at the international, national, and local levels.  Since these organizations are not elected and not accountable to the electorate, they are free to impose their will on the people.  All of this is driven by often deliberately fabricated needs of “sustainable development,” such as the Kyoto Protocol which would allow control over our economy by international bureaucracies that will impose carbon taxes and cap and trade schemes exactly as the Commission on Global Governance and Al Gore propose.  These partnerships create a neo-facist relationship between governments and corporations which create monopolies.  Once this process is fully in place there will no longer be free market enterprise, but rather total economic control by corporations and political elites.  It is a configuration predicted by Carroll Quigley in his book “Tragedy and Hope,” and is a defining factor of what is meant by the term “Global Governance” and “The New World Order.”

A CNN Lou Dobbs news report is shown explaining how corporate fascism is spreading throughout the North American continent, and how profits of corporations have increased 45% while wages of American workers has risen only 3% in the same time.  Also explained is how decision making processes are being shifted to dangerously configured and unaccountable corporations rather than through the electorate and elected officials.

A more recent George Bush plan for reducing carbon dioxide emissions has “improvements” over the Kyoto Protocol, however it still establishes a huge international bureaucracy which is not accountable to the United States and the world.  United Nations documents make is very clear that they want to set up a regulatory structure that would effect every man, woman, and child on planet Earth, and all of the control would be headquartered in the United Nations.

Temperatures Have Historically Driven CO2 Levels


This video clip from the film “Global Warming or Global Governance” shows that a major premise of the film “An Inconvenient Truth” is that Carbon Dioxide is the major greenhouse gas that drives the temperature of the Earth.  In fact a high correlation does exist between CO2 levels and temperature, however examinations of ice core data proves that temperature levels have driven the levels of CO2, not the other way around.  Historically CO2 levels have lagged temperature increases by as much as 800 years.

The Role of Water Vapor in Warming of the Climate


This video clip from the documentary “Global Warming or Global Governance” talks about the proportional roles that various greenhouse gasses have in warming the climate.

The overwhelming majority of the greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere is water vapor including clouds, which makes up 97% of all greenhouse gasses, with Carbon Dioxide making up less than 2%, with the remaining amount being made up of methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrous oxide.

Since man’s activies account for only 3% of the total carbon dioxide amount, it means that man is responsible for no more than 1% of all greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere.

The greenhouse power of water is demonstrated by the fact that temperatures in the desert can reach 110 degrees F, and then drop of 65 degrees during the night, being a drop of a 45 degrees due to the lack of moisture in the air.  Conversely, in the humid Southern US daytime temperates rarely go above 100 degrees F, and drop to only 80 degrees F, which is a difference of only 20 degrees.

The greenhouse effect of clouds is also readily apparent, where the temperature would drop to 50 degrees at night when it is clear, but it would remain at 65 degrees at night when it is cloudy.

Professor Tim Patterson, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Carleton: “If you want to categorize greenhouse gasses ...  Greenhouse gasses number one, two, three and four is water vapor, with Carbon Dioxide being a distant five.  CO2 has an influence, but it is certainly not significant enough for us to worry about.”

Tim Patterson, in testimony before Canada’s House of Commons Subcommittee on the Environment and Sustainable Development, Feb 10, 2005, “The paleoclimatic data that I and others have collected [shows] it is obvious that climate is and always has been variable.  In fact, the only constant about climate is change.  Change is continuous.”

Sea Level Issues - from “Global Warming or Global Governance?”


This video clip from the documentary “Global Warming or Global Governance” explains why the sea levels of the Earth will not rise by a significant amount over the next century, and it debunks some of the exaggerated claims about the effects of recent climate warming, such as the issue of supposedly declining polar bear populations.

While Al Gore claimed that sea levels could rise by as much as 20 feet over the next century due to ice melting on the edge of the Arctic and Greenland, it is shown that those claims are false due to the fact that as ice melts on the edges of those bodies, it tends to accumulate more in their centers due to increased precipitation.

On July 25, 1942, two B-17 Flying Fortresses were forced to make an emergency landing on Greenland’s southern ice cap.  The crew was rescued, but the planes were left on the ice.  In 1988, a team was led to find the missing planes.  They expected to find the planes within 40 feet of the surface, but they eventually found them 268 feet under the ice.  The team used hot water to extract a plane, and it is now flying again.  It is shown that the ice simply accumulated on top of the plane rather than pushing over it due to the plane being fully intact when it was extracted.

Links of Global Warming to Extreme Weather


This video clip explains that extreme weather activity such as tornadoes and hurricanes are not made stronger by the warming of the Earth’s climate, and in fact such storms are decreased in severity due to such warming.

It is often reported that hurricanes, blizzards, droughts and floods are increasing, and global warming is the cause.  However, historically storm frequency and storm intensity has been greatest during colder periods.  For example, storms were much more extreme during the the “Little Ace Age” between 1550 and 1850 AD.  The extreme weather during that time also caused crop failures and starvation, and it was a very difficult time to live.

It is shown that the active 2005 hurricane season is not associated with global warming according to data from the National Hurricane Center, which shows that there is no correlation between hurricanes and the warming climate over the past 150 years.  For example there were many more hurricanes between 1941 and 1950 than there are today.

Research at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is showing that global warming may actually decrease global warming, due it increasing wind sheer over tropical waters, such as during the 2006 El Nino year when no hurricanes struck the United States at all.

(A NOAA animation is also show explaining how wind sheer due to warmer temperatures works to help dissipate hurricanes.)

Positive Effects of CO2


This video clip shows how elevated levels of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere are shown not to be harmful, and in fact have many beneficial properties for the growth of plant life.

Many periods in the Earth’s past history have had CO2 levels much higher than they are today, which has been shown to be corresponding with increasingly abundant plant life and also the domestication of many plant species.

Research shows that if the amount of CO2 in the air were to double, it would increase food production from 20-50% depending on the types of crops grown.

Increased CO2 in the air also means that plants require less water, where it would make regions of the world suitable for growing crops where it is currently considered marginal for doing so.

Dr. Patrick j. Michaels, Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia: “The evidence that increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is going to cause a disaster is somewhere between “slim” and “none”; however, the evidence that it is doing a good thing by lengthening the growing season and making plants grow better is somewhere between “large” and “overwhelming.”

The Reality of Temperatures Over the Past Century


This video clip from the documentary “Global Warming or Global Governance?” talks about the reality of global temperatures over the past decade and century.

In 1998 a major El Nino occurred which made the temperatures of the Earth increase by 1 degree Celsius, and there has been no statistical increase in the climate’s temperature since that year despite continually increasing Carbon Dioxide levels.

Also, in August of 2007, analyst Stephen MacIntyre had discovered that NASA data supporting the claim that 1998 was the warmest year on record had contained an error, and in fact 1934 was the warmest year on record in the United States.  Out of the five hottest years of the past century, three occurred before 1940, and only two were found in the past ten years in the United States.

Issues with 'The Hockey Stick Curve'


This video clip explains inaccuracies with one of the most recently accepted methodologies for describing temperature variations over the past thousand years, known as the “Hockey Stick Curve,” which has been put forth in a report in 1998 entitled “MBH98,” which was quickly accepted by official organizations in the global warming community without proper auditing as the “smoking gun” showing that recent warming is unusual.

The report rejected previously widely accepted temperature graphs in favor of flattening the high and low temperatures over the past thousand years, which makes the current century appear to be out of the ordinary compared to the temperatures of the past.

An Independent audit put forth in the “MacIntyre McKitrick” report have shown the methodologies for deriving the “hockey stick curve” to be flawed due to a computer programming error, which has been shown to nearly always result in “hockey stick” shaped results with a variety of different input data.  The report created so much controversy that the US Congress authorized the National Academy of Sciences to study and report on the issue.  The National Academy essentially supported the “MacIntyre McKitrick” report by warning that the methodology used by the MBH98 report should not be used by this type of research because it “tends to bias the shape of the reconstructions.”  Although the report criticized other aspects of the MBH98 report, it did so in an apologetic manner, leading the media to proclaim that the report actually supported the MBH98 report.

Separate from the National Academy, the Energy and Commerce Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives commissioned three prominent statisticians chaired by Edward Wegman, Chairman of the National Sciences Committee on Theoretical and Applied Statistics to refute both the MBH98 and the Macintyre McKitrick report.  Wegman wrote, “While the work of Michael Mann and colleagues presents what appears to be compelling evidence of global temperature change, the criticisms of McIntyre and McKitrick, as well as those of other authors mentioned are indeed valid.  We found the MBH98 to be somewhat obscure and incomplete and the criticisms of [McIntyre-McKitrick] to be valid and compelling.”

In spite of many questions about the legitimacy of the “Hockey Stick” graph, Al Gore prominently displays its results in his film “Inconvenient Truth,” as do many official reports put out by the United Nations.