This compilation of video clips from the documentary video “Global Warming or Global Governance?” explains why many scientists, journalists, and politicians of the political Establishment have an agenda of perpetuating the idea of current global warming being extreme and caused by man’s activities, despite much surprising evidence to the contrary— largely due to common ulterior motives of offering solutions which actually impose deceptive and dangerous globalist agendas.

Currently over $4 billion is being spent annually on global warming research, and the issue has turned into a cottage industry with a large cadre of scientists on “soft money”— meaning they would cease to recieve funding if they do not somehow show a global warming connection to carbon dioxide emissions through their research.

Scientists who deny man caused warming are frequently accused of taking money from the energy industry, but very often the opposite is true.  Many energy companies exert heavy political pressure for allocating increasingly large amounts of money to the global warming issue and for passing economically damaging legislation, and often such companies individually receive billions of dollars from that legislation.

Global warming issues are being used by powerful political organizations to help form a centralized world government, by setting precedents for international control and regulation that are shown to actually have little or nothing to do with global warming.  The video clip shows many examples of political elites having deceptive agendas of dissolving the sovereignty of nations including the United States, through setting up treaties that erode personal freedoms, national security, and land ownership, among many other rights.

The media and political groups such as the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) commonly distorts issues concerning global warming by continually stating that it is a “settled science” and there is no longer any reason to debate, even though it is shown that a large proportion of climate scientists are doubtful of man’s role in global warming and they do not believe that the science is sound enough for formulating policy decisions.

Most people in the government and media get the wrong impression from reading the “Summaries for Policy Makers” put out by the IPCC.  Dr. Vincent Gray, an Expert IPCC Reviewer and Climate Consultant in New Zealand says, “This ‘Summary for Policy Makers’ isn’t a summary for policy makers at all, it is a summary ‘by’ policy makers— in other words, it is a summary that is agreed line by line, by government representatives.  The IPCC is a political organization, set up by the United Nations, to provide evidence to support the framework convention on climate change which has been signed by governments, it is entirely political.”

Also shown is a CNN broadcast by Chris Horner explaining how the IPCC reports are controlled by bureaucrats, policy makers, and pressure group lobbyists who modify the findings of contributing scientists to conform to pre-specified summaries that are established months before the underlying work is actually even written.

Phyllis Schlafly explains the issue of the United Nations global conferences, “These global conferences pretend to be democratic conventions of representatives of more than 100 nations who come together to vote for plans they all agree on— nothing could be further from the truth.  The policies are all written ahead of time, and the so-called ‘delegates’ are manipulated to produce what is called ‘consensus.’  The consensus is never submitted to Congress.” For example, Kathy Adams of the Texas Eagle Forum explains that the consensus process at a recent United Nations meeting about global warming was so firmly planted that at the opening day of the conference that there was consensus already formed, without suitable opportunity for debate.  Essentially the agenda had been set beforehand and delegates come to the table to find what their working orders are.  [Note: October 13, 2022— Years ago I had very naively criticized Phyllis Schlafly, as it was before I was fully aware of the agendas of the New Word Order.  She was outspoken about conservative stances, such as being opposed to the benevolent-sounding leftist “Equal Rights Amendment” which she successfully blocked from being ratified into the U.S. Constitution in 1978.  Thankfully it never became a part of the Constitution.  (And have women somehow suffered because of that?— Certainly not.)]

Coffman explains why the Koyoto protocol has nothing to do with actually reducing the carbon dioxide levels in the Earth’s atmosphere.  Nations such as China and Russia would not be bound by the treaty and could continue to expand and pollute forever, and in fact China will overtake the emissions of carbon dioxide by the United States within two years.  In actually, it is a massive income redistribution plan to shift money to third world nations as well as making them subservient, and it will not help global warming whatsoever.

Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope” which was published in 1975 explains many of the long-term agendas of the Globalists, including “...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.  This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. (p 324).”  These private groups, meetings and conferences still exist today under a cloud of secrecy, such as with the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and many others.

The phrase “New World Order” raised many red flags of concern and was dropped almost as soon as President Bush mentioned it during the first Gulf War.  Soon afterwards, The Commission on Global Governance was formed in association with the United Nations, and in the report “Our Global Neighborhood” published in 1995, it laid out a list of implementation goals for global governance, and it reported that exploiting issues concerning the environment are key to that agenda.  On page 208 it states, “Considerable strides have been made in creating a system of international environmental governance to achieve global sustainable development through the management of cross-border environmental disputes and protection of the global commons.”  On page 213 it states, “A carbon tax...  would no doubt be a valuable step forward... towards a radically different system— one that taxes the resource use rather than employment (through payroll taxes) and savings.  This would recognize the need to discourage excessive consumption and would stimulate employment as part of a strategy of sustainable development.”  This strategy is used in Al Gore’s proposed plans for implementing carbon taxes.

Al Gore is interested in the use of “cap and trade schemes” which are to be implemented through a system he helped to create while being Vice President which involves “public-private partnerships”— which shift decision making from the electorate and elected officials to a non-accountable partnership of non-governmental organizations, government bureaucracies, and multinational corporations at the international, national, and local levels.  Since these organizations are not elected and not accountable to the electorate, they are free to impose their will on the people.  All of this is driven by often deliberately fabricated needs of “sustainable development,” such as the Kyoto Protocol which would allow control over our economy by international bureaucracies that will impose carbon taxes and cap and trade schemes exactly as the Commission on Global Governance and Al Gore propose.  These partnerships create a neo-facist relationship between governments and corporations which create monopolies.  Once this process is fully in place there will no longer be free market enterprise, but rather total economic control by corporations and political elites.  It is a configuration predicted by Carroll Quigley in his book “Tragedy and Hope,” and is a defining factor of what is meant by the term “Global Governance” and “The New World Order.”

A CNN Lou Dobbs news report is shown explaining how corporate fascism is spreading throughout the North American continent, and how profits of corporations have increased 45% while wages of American workers has risen only 3% in the same time.  Also explained is how decision making processes are being shifted to dangerously configured and unaccountable corporations rather than through the electorate and elected officials.

A more recent George Bush plan for reducing carbon dioxide emissions has “improvements” over the Kyoto Protocol, however it still establishes a huge international bureaucracy which is not accountable to the United States and the world.  United Nations documents make is very clear that they want to set up a regulatory structure that would effect every man, woman, and child on planet Earth, and all of the control would be headquartered in the United Nations.